THE PLA IN CHINA’S FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICY-MAKING: DRIVERS, MECHANISM AND INTERACTIONS

Embargo until
2019-08-01
Date
2015-08-11
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Johns Hopkins University
Abstract
Abstract This dissertation develops a “dynamic bargaining” thesis, in which a two-level bargaining game among three actors (the Chinese Communist Party (Party), the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), and the civilian foreign affairs system) determines the level of influence the PLA exerts over China’s foreign and security policy-making since 1978. This dissertation is based on 138 interviews with active-duty and retired military officers, 125 interviews with policy-makers and analysts in China, and original Chinese-language sources and secondary documents. The dissertation divides China’s foreign and security policies into “high” policies – those that are sensitive and core national interests and require the intervention of China’s top leader – and “low” policies – those that are tactical in nature and constitute the majority of China’s foreign and security policies. The dynamics of a “reliance-control model” determine the PLA’s influence in “high” policies. The top leader’s political reliance on the PLA is the first and foremost necessary condition for such Party-military bargaining to occur. Once this necessary condition is met, the extent to which the top leader is able to establish “effective control” over the PLA helps determine the PLA’s access and hence the level of its influence. In “low” policies, the PLA’s level of influence depends on its bureaucratic bargaining with the civilian foreign affairs system, in particular the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA or MOFA). Such bargaining has operated on the basis of four rules of the game, namely the advantage of: early entry during times of overwhelming external threats; strong allies/weak opponents; strong motivations; and supportive public opinion. The level of influence the PLA exerts in the policy-making process is also partly determined by its motivation. The PLA is a military force in transition, and its motivation to intervene during the policy-making process is determined by three sets of dynamics: inward vs. outward orientation; professionalization vs. politicization; and unity vs. inter-service rivalry. This dissertation argues that the PLA has a political orientation of being “progressive moderates” in China’s domestic politics, which contributes to its preoccupation with its internal mission and deepens the differentiation between the Party’s and military’s interest, outlook, and goal. As a result of its own evolution, the PLA is likely not seeking major armed confrontation, but may be more welcoming of continuous friction and low-intensity wars of limited scope. Advisor: David M. Lampton Secondary Reader: Kent Calder Chair: Francis Fukuyama Committee Members: Bruce G. Blair and Michael D. Swaine
Description
Keywords
PLA, People's Liberation of Army, China, PRC, Politburo, PBSC, Central Committee, CMC, Central Military Commission, military region, General Staff Department, GSD, General Politics Department, GPD, Party-military relations, civil-military relations, Party army, Party-army, national army, professionalization, politicization, NSC, National Security Commission, foreign and security policy, policy-making, policymaking, policy implementation, chain of command, military influence, military’s political influence, bargaining politics, bureaucratic bargaining, bureaucratic process, national security policy-making, national security policies, Deng Xiaoping, Jiang Zemin, Hu Jintao, Xi Jinping, South China Sea, East China Sea, ASAT, general departments, Paracels, Spratly Islands, PLA Navy, PLAN, PLA Air Force, PLAAF, Second Artillery, Taiwan, Korean Peninsula, North Korea, Sino-Vietnamese war, inter-service rivalry, MFA, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, MND, Ministry of Defense, CMS, Chinese Coast Guard, defense budget, Cultural Revolution, Cao Gangchuan, Liu Huaqing, netizen, nationalism, public pressure, MOOTW, Zhao Ziyang, autonomy, military intelligence, combat troops, professionalism, professionalization, external threat, leading small groups, FALSG, EEZ, aircraft carrier, J-20, PAP, Yang Shangkun, Zhou Yongkang, Sino-Indian border, General Armament Department, GAD, GSD, Yinhe Incident, Africa, Sino-US relations, Sino-U.S., foreign policy, SLOC, Taiwan, Taiwan affairs, policy-making, timetable, timetable strategy, RMA, Liu Yazhou, Liu Yuan, Zhu Chenghu, Dai Xu, Kokang, Xiong Guangkai, decision-making, crisis management, escalation, Scarborough, standoff, Sino-Indian border, Zhang Wannian, Zhang Zhen, Lampton, Swaine, leading small groups, NPC, war-fighting, cyber security, aggressive, hawkish, moderate.
Citation