China Studies Review
dc.contributor.author | Collins-Chase, Ned | |
dc.contributor.author | Van Gilder, Amanda | |
dc.contributor.author | Li, Miaosu | |
dc.contributor.author | Pollok, Benjamin | |
dc.contributor.author | Yi, Minh Joo | |
dc.contributor.author | Malden, Kaj | |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Adam | |
dc.contributor.author | Connely-Kanmaz, Christina | |
dc.contributor.author | Keyserling, Alex | |
dc.contributor.author | Schut, Kyle | |
dc.contributor.author | Yi, Minh Joo | |
dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Yuqian | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-07-15T19:11:07Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-07-15T19:11:07Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.citation | China Studies Review, Issue no. 3 (2017) | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://jhir.library.jhu.edu/handle/1774.2/62846 | |
dc.description.abstract | The first section of this issue features two brief issue papers. Ned Collins-Chase examines the Qianhai Free Trade Zone and considers its prospects as a tool for Chinese capital account liberalization. Minh Joo Yi surveys China’s foreign policy calculus under Presi-dent Xi Jinping and notes Beijing’s growing assertiveness in foreign affairs. In the second section of this issue, we pres-ent three research articles spanning China’s environment, nuclear weapons strategy, and economy. Miaosu Li analyzes a little understood aspect of China’s wind energy development - the associated environmen-tal costs of rare-earth metal processing - and calls for a more nuanced assessment of Chinese energy policy and implemen-tation. Amanda Van Gilder provides a comprehensive analysis of the nuclear bal-ance between the United States and China. She concludes that while the United States will maintain nuclear superiority for the next one to two decades, the gap will close as China gradually attains doctrinal and tech-nological parity. Benjamin Pollok compares the homeward investment patterns of the diaspora populations of China and India. Pollok attributes China’s greater success in attracting this investment to its active dias-pora engagement policies — a strategy not yet meaningfully pursued by India. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Johns Hopkins University, Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, China Studies Program | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | China Studies Review;No. 3 | |
dc.subject | China | en_US |
dc.subject | China - Politics and government | en_US |
dc.subject | China - Economy | en_US |
dc.subject | China - Foreign Policy | en_US |
dc.subject | Environment | en_US |
dc.title | China Studies Review | en_US |
dc.type | Other | en_US |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
China Studies Program
A study program that offers a nuanced understanding of China's political and economic system in contemporary and historical context.