Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRiley, MF
dc.contributor.authorMerrill, R
dc.date.accessioned2006-12-04T21:56:19Z
dc.date.available2006-12-04T21:56:19Z
dc.date.issued2005-08-25
dc.identifier.citation6 Colum. Sci. & Tech. L. Rev. 1 (2005) URL: http://www.stlr.org/cite.cgi?volume=6&article=1en
dc.identifier.urihttp://jhir.library.jhu.edu/handle/1774.2/991
dc.description.abstractMany people are now advocating expanded government regulation of research and clinical use of reproductive technologies. Although many of these technologies have been in use or anticipated for more than twenty-five years, and a number of bioethics commissions have considered regulation of them, efforts to develop broad national regulation have largely failed. This article examines the role that government institutions can play and have played in designing regulation of assisted reproduction and reproductive technologies. We review the history of national commissions as proponents and architects of regulation and explore how their structure, mission, and political placement have influenced their success or failure. We then compare the experience of the United States to that of Great Britain which established the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority (HFEA) in 1990 and consider whether the HFEA might be a model for future regulation in the United States. We conclude that bioethics commissions can play an important role in formulating policy but they cannot create necessary political consensus if that consensus is lacking. Moreover, while the United States can glean important lessons from the British experience, the two countries' political, legal, and medical cultures differ in ways that suggest importation of the British model would be difficult and perhaps unwise.en
dc.format.extent595634 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherGenetics and Public Policy Centeren
dc.subjectReproductive Techniques, Assisteden
dc.subjectLegislation, Medicalen
dc.subjectAdvisory Committeesen
dc.subjectEthicsen
dc.titleRegulating reproductive genetics: A review of American bioethics commissions and comparison to the British Human Fertilization and Embryology Authorityen
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record